[gdal-dev] OGR-VFK in 1.9

Etienne Tourigny etourigny.dev at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 12:22:07 PST 2012


in any case, the vfk driver would be optional (or at least could be
disabled), so should not create any problems for people that do not
compile it, right?

Etienne

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Even Rouault
<even.rouault at mines-paris.org> wrote:
> Selon Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2012/10/26 Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>:
>> >> However, as your changes only affect your driver, I think it would be
>> >> easier to commit them to 1.9.0 without an RFC.  It would be easier if
>> >> you prepare a small wiki page (similar to RFCs) describing the
>> >> changes, and create at least one bug entry.
>> >
>> > I have filled the ticket for this issue [1]. If a wiki page is also
>> > required I will prepare it too.
>> >
>> > Thanks for info in advance. Best regards, Martin
>> >
>> > [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4872
>>
>> important from my POV is to include the updated VFK driver in 1.9.3.
>> Suggested changes affects only VFK driver. Are there any objections
>> for backporting VFK driver to 1.9 branch?
>
> Martin,
>
> I don't have objections. My only fear is that the addition of the SQLite
> dependency in the VFK driver would cause compilation problems in some
> setups/platforms that would have an ancient SQLite version for example. But as
> we have already the SQLite dependency in the GML driver, provided you don't use
> too recent sqlite3_XXX functions (and a quick grep does not show anything exotic
> indeed), this should be OK. Did you also test that the compilation is OK for
> people who configure GDAL without the sqlite dependency ?
>
> Even


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list