[gdal-dev] Call for discussion for "RFC 41 : Support for multiple geometry fields in OGR"
Even Rouault
even.rouault at mines-paris.org
Wed Jul 24 07:46:37 PDT 2013
Le mercredi 24 juillet 2013 16:07:49, Andreas Neumann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I can't comment about the technical issues. But from a user point of
> view there is a need to have more than one geometry representation per
> feature. There could be several generalizations attached to a feature,
> or different states.
>
> I would welcome such a feature in OGR.
>
> I guess Swisstopo also has a specific use case in mind since they
> sponsor the work. Do you know which?
Andreas,
I believe there are in particular interested in being able to make use of the
multiple geometry support available in the Interlis format ( the Interlis spec
itself is a bit complicated to follow. The most obvious evidence I found about
multiple geometry in Interlis is
http://www.eisenhutinformatik.ch/interlis/ili2fme/interlis2-20120202.pdf
paragraph 12.2 )
Funnily enough, this topic was raised in this old thread :
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2008-January/thread.html#15880
Even
--
Geospatial professional services
http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list