[gdal-dev] (no subject)

[Phelippe Neveu]

Hello Frank,

We would probably go with the approach #2. We will also have to merge any changes made in GDAL if any changes were done since our last update which was 2 years ago I think.

I'm going on vacation for the next week, so I will get back to you on the 18th of November to arrange the access to the sandbox.

Regards,

Phelippe
________________________________
From: fwarmerdam at gmail.com <fwarmerdam at gmail.com> on behalf of Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 16:34
To: Phelippe Neveu
Cc: gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org; David Stanley; Louis Burry
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] (no subject)

Phelippe,

There are a few ways we could move forward on this.

I believe the apparent master version of the PCIDSK SDK from GDAL's point of view is:

  http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/sandbox/warmerdam/pcidsk

And I think the process I used before was to periodally migrate this into the GDAL tree at:

  http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/trunk/gdal/frmts/pcidsk/sdk/

Approaches:

1) You just drop a code dump on us, and existing developers integrate it.

2) We arrange commit access for you and you prepare an updated SDK in the "sandbox" area in SVN.  We could then migrate that into the GDAL PCIDSK driver itself when we are comfortable with it.

3) We arrange full commit access for you and you do your integration directly in GDAL itself.

I prefer option (2) which avoids the likely breakage in GDAL that might come from a wholesale replacement of the existing inside-GDAL code.  But those who wish can still built against the standalone SDK for testing purposes and so forth.  I'd imagine I'd be the GDAL developer to help move things over eventually.

If you are ok with (2) then please create an OSGeo at:

  http://www.osgeo.org/osgeo_userid/

And I'll try to arrange sandbox-only commit access for you.

Best regards,
Frank



On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Phelippe Neveu <neveu at pcigeomatics.com<mailto:neveu at pcigeomatics.com>> wrote:
To whom it may concern,

We have updates to the PCIDSK library that we would like to upstream to GDAL.

We have fixed numerous bugs, we have done many optimizations, and we also implemented a new binary tile directory.

How should we proceed with the upstream?

Thanks,

Phelippe

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev



--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com<mailto:warmerdam at pobox.com>
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20131108/3b8fa6f1/attachment.html>