[gdal-dev] Geo::GDAL for GDAL 1.10.1?
Even Rouault
even.rouault at mines-paris.org
Tue Sep 17 08:19:13 PDT 2013
> Still one more thing, if 1.10.1 is the very latest with Evan's multiple
> geometries per feature, I suspect that it may have some implications in
> the Perl bindings. There are quite a lot Perl stuff in the bindings
> (maybe even too much) and some of them might assume only one geometry
> per feature.
Actually no: RFC41 is trunk only, so GDAL 2.0 or 1.11 or whatever we might end
up calling it.
And the changes in RFC41 have been done with backward compatibility in mind. So
code that hasn't been updated to take into account RFC41 new API should still
work with the old API (GetGeometryRef() will return the first geometry field if
there are several geometry fields).
Even
> >
> > Thanks anyway
> >
> > H.
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/17 Hernán De Angelis <dhdeangelis at gmail.com
> > <mailto:dhdeangelis at gmail.com>>
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I cannot figure out how to get the Geo::GDAL module installed in
> > my system. I understand that the bindings are built when compiling
> > GDAL with the --with-perl option, but I cannot see where the
> > Geo::GDAL modules are, so I can load them with "use Geo::GDAL". I
> > will appreciate any hint on this, thanks in advance
> >
> >
> > Hernán
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hernán De Angelis
> > http://talesoficeandstone.blogspot.se/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hernán De Angelis
> > http://talesoficeandstone.blogspot.se/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gdal-dev mailing list
> > gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list