[gdal-dev] Motion: Promote 1.11.0RC1 for release

[Kurt Schwehr]

Pretty much everything working with fink on the mac on 10.9 with xcode 5.1
and fink's python 2.7.  Test results below.  Created one new issue.

-kurt

test_gdaltindex4 failing: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5440

Packaging files:
https://github.com/schwehr/fink-10.9/tree/1fd286b6f90a56803c8838789e1b84080a7c386b/libs

Autotest results: http://schwehr.org/gdal/gdal-1.11.0RC1-autotest.txt

Succeeded: 2876
Failed:    42 (10 blew exceptions)
Skipped:   753
Expected fail:12
Duration:  05m34.0s
As GDAL_DOWNLOAD_TEST_DATA environment variable is not defined, 109 tests
relying on data to downloaded from the Web have been skipped
As GDAL_RUN_SLOW_TESTS environment variable is not defined, 22 "slow" tests
have been skipped

grep fail gdal-1.11.0RC1-autotest.txt | grep TEST
  TEST: ogr_couchdb_SetAttributeFilter ... ERROR 1: Filter creation failed
: unauthorized, You are not a db or server admin.
  TEST: gdal_api_proxy_3 ... Fails on MacOSX ('ERROR 1: posix_spawnp()
failed'. Not sure why.
  TEST: jpeg_1 ... fail


    line 435: Checksum for band 2 in "albania.jpg" is 34296, but expected
17016.

fink list -i libjpeg
 i   libjpeg9-shlibs           9a-1                Shared libraries for
libjpeg package


  TEST: lcp_17 ... expected_fail
  TEST: mbtiles_2 ... fail
  TEST: mem_6 ... python(82931,0x7fff7b8b0310) malloc: ***
mach_vm_map(size=18446744004990078976) failed (error code=3)
  TEST: rasterlite_2 ... fail
  TEST: webp_2 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdaltindex_4 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdaltindex_5 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_18 ... fail
  TEST: ogr_osm_3 ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: ogr_osm_3_sqlite_nodes ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: ogr_osm_3_custom_compress_nodes ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: ogr_osm_6 ... fail
  TEST: basic_test_8 ... fail
  TEST: http_4 ... fail
  TEST: jpeg_1 ... fail
  TEST: jpeg_16 ... fail
  TEST: jpeg2000_8 ... fail
  TEST: mbtiles_2 ... fail
  TEST: png_copy_icc ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: png_copy_options_icc ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: rasterlite_2 ... fail
  TEST: webp_2 ... fail
  TEST: webp_3 ... fail
  TEST: webp_4 ... fail
  TEST: warp_27 ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: warp_38 ... fail
  TEST: warp_39 ... fail
  TEST: warp_39 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalinfo_11 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalinfo_13 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdaltindex_4 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdaltindex_5 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdaltransform_5 ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: test_gdaltransform_7 ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_4 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_15 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_18 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_24 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_25 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_26 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_27 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_28 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_29 ... fail
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_30 ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: test_gdalwarp_31 ... fail
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_18 ... fail (blowup)
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_46 ... fail
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_47 ... fail
  TEST: test_ogrinfo_12 ... fail
  TEST: test_ogrlineref_1 ... fail


On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Even Rouault
<even.rouault at mines-paris.org>wrote:

> Le dimanche 20 avril 2014 16:21:40, Martin Landa a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2014-04-20 16:03 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org>:
> > > Motion: GDAL/OGR 1.11.0RC1 is promoted to be the official 1.11.0 final
> > > release.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > No critical issue has been specifically reported on RC1 so far, so I
> > > invite PSC members to vote on this motion after doing your own testing
> > > and validation. Input from everyone else who can test it is also very
> > > welcome.
> >
> > sorry for the noise, I would just expect that RC period will take
> > about two weeks. In any case no objections, just my 2eurocents, Martin
>
> There is no hard rule for that. In the past, AFAICS, the vote for
> promoting a
> RC was asked just 2 or 3 days after issuing it. And Beta1 was released on
> the
> 4th, so more than 2 weeks. I don't see the benefit in waiting more, unless
> there are people who would express the need for some more time to test it.
> I think that there are 2 categories of people : early adopters who track
> trunk
> on a regular basis, or more cautious users who wait for the official
> release.
>
> --
> Geospatial professional services
> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>



-- 
--
http://schwehr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20140420/0b402fdd/attachment.html>