[gdal-dev] cmake4gdal?

[Dmitriy Baryshnikov]

Hi Scott,

I make the table of cmaking the GDAL. 
https://github.com/nextgis/gdal_svn/wiki/cmake-driver-status
May be some drivers that already cmaked I missed and vice versa, but the 
whole picture can be seen.

About "is the probability of cmake4gdal replacing autotools" I agreed 
with Even. We need the full and working system and several releases.
Also, cmake not to influence on gdal sources, so the two build systems 
can live together and one can use the preferable.
Certanly I prefer cmake :)

Also, I forgot to mention, that some checks in autoconf (the C/C++ test 
code) should be add to cmake too.

P.S.
Be free to send your pull request with cmaking of GDAL to our repo.

Best regards,
     Dmitry

10.02.2015 02:34, Scott Bailey пишет:
> Dmitry,
>
> Great!  So which drivers need CMake help?
>
> And what is the probability of cmake4gdal replacing autotools?
>
> SB
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Dmitriy Baryshnikov 
> <bishop.dev at gmail.com <mailto:bishop.dev at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Scott,
>
>     The latest code is here:
>     1) https://github.com/nextgis/gdal_svn/tree/cmake4gdal
>     2) https://github.com/nextgis/gdal_svn/tree/rsmd-reader-dev <--
>     this my current branch
>     3) https://github.com/nextgis/gdal_svn/tree/wms-ags-dev
>
>     There are some problems:
>     there is no autotest directory in current repo, but it'll be more
>     correctly to have the whole fork, not only sources (CTest?).
>     So I plan to merge this three branches and make the full fork
>     (with autotest) of OSGeo/GDAL in github.
>
>     Anyhow we need to complete all drivers which is not yet cmaked.
>     I plan to create wiki page in new repo with table of all GDAL
>     drivers and their cmaking status and total percent.
>
>     By now we need:
>     1) More testing and fixing on all platforms
>     2) Cmaked all drivers and applications, which is not yet cmaked
>     3) I plan to play with third party libs by cmake mechanism -
>     ExternalProject_Add
>
>     As for me the 2) is more important.
>
>     Best regards,
>          Dmitry
>
>     09.02.2015 22:02, Scott Bailey пишет:
>>     Building GDAL for Linux is a snap, MSVS is OK, but I find myself
>>     struggling to get a compilation with MINGW.
>>
>>     I've cloned the cmake4gdal 1.9 git repo and built that in Linux. 
>>     As expected it was simple.  Haven't had time to play with MINGW,
>>     yet.  Never-the-less, I've found CMake based projects less
>>     frustrating than autotools when building with Windows, especially
>>     when using MINGW.
>>
>>     What is the status of cmake4gdal?  Is there something I should do
>>     to help?
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Scott Bailey
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     gdal-dev mailing list
>>     gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org  <mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     gdal-dev mailing list
>     gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Scott Bailey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20150210/29b55668/attachment.html>