[gdal-dev] Two versions of gdal

Gane R gane.prog at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 07:18:30 PST 2015


Thanks for your reply, I have a requirement that I should have two GDALs. I
have also an issue, I have build gdal 2.0.1 with proj4 as static, it does
not process the geometry inside from filegeodb. any thoughts will be
appreciated. I have the GDAL_DATA environ set, and pro4 share lib also
exist on the machine and ldconfig is also called to update the shared
library.

Thanks
Gane



On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Ivan Lucena <lucena_ivan at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> You don't need to build two gdal versions.
>
>
> You can build GDAL (libgal.so) without the driver and then you build the
> driver as a plugin (ogr_FileGDB.so).
>
>
> ./configure -without-fgdb
>
> make
>
>
> ./configure -with-fgdb
>
> make
>
>
> You can choose to use the drive, or not, by managing the GDAL_DRIVER_PATH
> environment variable.
>
>
> The advantage is that libgdal.so is not going to depend on FileGDB SDK.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* gdal-dev <gdal-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Gane R <
> gane.prog at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, November 23, 2015 8:24 AM
> *To:* Even Rouault; gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* [gdal-dev] Two versions of gdal
>
> I have a requirement of two version of gdal one with filegeodb (gdal
> 2.0.1) and other without filegeodb (gdal 2.0.1) on linux, any references
> how this can make co exist ?
>
> thanks
> Gane
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20151123/d3faa797/attachment.html>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list