[gdal-dev] RFC 61: Call for vote on adoption

Ari Jolma ari.jolma at gmail.com
Fri Feb 5 03:57:06 PST 2016



05.02.2016, 10:49, Even Rouault kirjoitti:
> Le vendredi 05 février 2016 09:04:00, Ari Jolma a écrit :
>> I'd like to ask the PSC and others to vote on adopting RFC 61: Support
>> for measured geometries.
> +1
>
>> The draft RFC is at
>>
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc61_support_for_measured_geometries
>>
>> and a draft implementation is at
>>
>> https://github.com/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM
>>
>> which is tested at
>>
>> https://travis-ci.org/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM
>>
>> (the test #34,
> What is test #34 ?

https://travis-ci.org/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM/builds/106980691

...it has #34


>
>> which passed, was the so far last one after core changes
>> with unchanged autotests and a rather comprehensive set of WKT tests in
>> the Perl tests directory)
>>
> I see some failures in latest build, apparently related to -nlt POLYGON25D / -
> lco SHPT=POLYGONZ in the shapefile driver

Yes, it fails now since the shapefile driver is partially implemented - 
only points and linestrings so far.

I made it skip one test in ogr_shape.py, which relied on the M to Z hacks.


>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/107177078/log.txt
>
>   ------------ Failures ------------
> Script: utilities/test_ogr2ogr_lib.py
>    TEST: test_ogr2ogr_lib_7 ... fail
> Script: utilities/test_gdal_grid_lib.py
>    TEST: test_gdal_grid_lib_1 ... fail
> Script: utilities/test_ogr2ogr.py
>    TEST: test_ogr2ogr_11 ... fail
>    TEST: test_ogr2ogr_12 ... fail
>    TEST: test_ogr2ogr_43 ... fail
> Script: pyscripts/test_ogr2ogr_py.py
>    TEST: test_ogr2ogr_py_11 ... fail
>    TEST: test_ogr2ogr_py_12 ... fail
>    TEST: test_ogr2ogr_py_43 ... fail
>   ----------------------------------
>
>> This is seemingly a small change but it is at the heart of OGR so it has
>> some important implications. The only backwards incompatibilities that
>> have appeared so far are with some drivers, for example shapefile, which
>> can be lessened with, e.g., open options.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ari



More information about the gdal-dev mailing list