[gdal-dev] RFC 61: Call for vote on adoption

Even Rouault even.rouault at spatialys.com
Fri Feb 5 00:49:40 PST 2016


Le vendredi 05 février 2016 09:04:00, Ari Jolma a écrit :
> I'd like to ask the PSC and others to vote on adopting RFC 61: Support
> for measured geometries.

+1

> 
> The draft RFC is at
> 
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc61_support_for_measured_geometries
> 
> and a draft implementation is at
> 
> https://github.com/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM
> 
> which is tested at
> 
> https://travis-ci.org/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM
> 
> (the test #34, 

What is test #34 ?

> which passed, was the so far last one after core changes
> with unchanged autotests and a rather comprehensive set of WKT tests in
> the Perl tests directory)
> 

I see some failures in latest build, apparently related to -nlt POLYGON25D / -
lco SHPT=POLYGONZ in the shapefile driver

https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/107177078/log.txt

 ------------ Failures ------------
Script: utilities/test_ogr2ogr_lib.py
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_lib_7 ... fail
Script: utilities/test_gdal_grid_lib.py
  TEST: test_gdal_grid_lib_1 ... fail
Script: utilities/test_ogr2ogr.py
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_11 ... fail
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_12 ... fail
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_43 ... fail
Script: pyscripts/test_ogr2ogr_py.py
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_py_11 ... fail
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_py_12 ... fail
  TEST: test_ogr2ogr_py_43 ... fail
 ----------------------------------

> This is seemingly a small change but it is at the heart of OGR so it has
> some important implications. The only backwards incompatibilities that
> have appeared so far are with some drivers, for example shapefile, which
> can be lessened with, e.g., open options.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Ari

-- 
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list