[gdal-dev] Core dump using gdal_translate to create geopackage

Jesse McGraw jlmcgraw at gmail.com
Mon Feb 15 08:15:08 PST 2016


Thanks Even.

I've uploaded it to dropbox here: 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7tcxh9bvk4127c6/Washington_SEC.tif?dl=0



On 02/15/2016 09:53 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
> Jesse,
>
> The geotiff would be necessary to replicate.
>
> Even
>
> Le lundi 15 février 2016 15:46:15, Jesse McGraw a écrit :
>> I was fiddling with Even's geopackage examples
>> <http://erouault.blogspot.com/2014/12/gdal-geopackage-raster-support.html>
>> when I came across a core dump issue in gdal_translate
>>
>> gdal version is compiled from github trunk as of 15 February 2016 under
>> Ubuntu 15.10 x64
>>
>>      gdal_translate --version
>>      GDAL 2.1.0dev, released 2015/99/99
>>
>>
>>
>> I can share the geotiff in question if need be.  Let me know if I can
>> provide any other helpful information
>>
>> Basic command is:
>>
>>      gdal_translate \
>>           Washington_SEC.tif \
>>           test.gpkg \
>>           -of GPKG \
>>           -co TILE_FORMAT=PNG \
>>           -co TILING_SCHEME=GoogleMapsCompatible
>>
>>
>> Out from Valgrind is:
>>
>>      jlmcgraw at UbuntuMate1504:~/Documents/myPrograms/gdal_tests$
>>      CPL_DEBUG=ON \
>>
>>       > valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes --read-var-info=yes \
>>       > gdal_translate \
>>       >
>>       >     Washington_SEC.tif \
>>       >     test.gpkg \
>>       >     -of GPKG \
>>       >     -co TILE_FORMAT=PNG \
>>       >     -co TILING_SCHEME=GoogleMapsCompatible
>>
>>      ==30978== Memcheck, a memory error detector
>>      ==30978== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward
>>      et al.
>>      ==30978== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for
>>      copyright info
>>      ==30978== Command: gdal_translate Washington_SEC.tif test.gpkg -of
>>      GPKG -co TILE_FORMAT=PNG -co TILING_SCHEME=GoogleMapsCompatible
>>      ==30978==
>>      GDAL: GDALOpen(Washington_SEC.tif, this=0xf7e9d80) succeeds as GTiff.
>>      Input file size is 15538, 11309
>>      GDAL: GDAL_CACHEMAX = 100 MB
>>      GDAL: GDALWarpKernel()::GWKGeneralCase()
>>      Src=0,0,1944x1415 Dst=0,0,2737x1992
>>      0GDAL: GDALWarpKernel()::GWKGeneralCase()
>>      Src=1941,0,1945x1415 Dst=2737,0,2737x1992
>>      .GDAL: GDALWarpKernel()::GWKGeneralCase()
>>      Src=3883,0,1945x1415 Dst=5474,0,2737x1992
>>      --30978-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf2
>>      --30978-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf2
>>      --30978-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf2
>>      --30978-- warning: evaluate_Dwarf3_Expr: unhandled DW_OP_ 0xf2
>>      ==30978== Invalid write of size 8
>>      ==30978==    at 0x4C3259F: memset (in
>>      /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5692CD8: memset (string3.h:90)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5692CD8: GDALGeoPackageDataset::ReadTile(int, int,
>>      unsigned char*, bool*) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:641)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5692FA2: GDALGeoPackageDataset::ReadTile(int, int)
>>      (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:489)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5694B51: GDALGeoPackageRasterBand::IReadBlock(int,
>>      int, void*) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:733)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5553B15: GDALRasterBand::GetLockedBlockRef(int,
>>      int, int) (gdalrasterband.cpp:1142)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5572525: GDALRasterBand::IRasterIO(GDALRWFlag,
>>      int, int, int, int, void*, int, int, GDALDataType, long long, long
>>      long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (rasterio.cpp:307)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x557312A:
>>      GDALDataset::BlockBasedRasterIO(GDALRWFlag, int, int, int, int,
>>      void*, int, int, GDALDataType, int, int*, long long, long long, long
>>      long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (rasterio.cpp:2938)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x551B09C: GDALDataset::RasterIO(GDALRWFlag, int,
>>      int, int, int, void*, int, int, GDALDataType, int, int*, long long,
>>      long long, long long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (gdaldataset.cpp:1991)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x551B11D: GDALDatasetRasterIO (gdaldataset.cpp:2034)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x56384C4: GDALWarpOperation::WarpRegion(int, int,
>>      int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, double, double)
>>      (gdalwarpoperation.cpp:1370)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x56387C6: GDALWarpOperation::ChunkAndWarpImage(int,
>>      int, int, int) (gdalwarpoperation.cpp:720)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x57A9F5A: GDALGeoPackageDataset::CreateCopy(char
>>      const*, GDALDataset*, int, char**, int (*)(double, char const*,
>>      void*), void*) (ogrgeopackagedatasource.cpp:3242)
>>      ==30978==  Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== Process terminating with default action of signal 11
>> (SIGSEGV) ==30978==  Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
>>      ==30978==    at 0x4C3259F: memset (in
>>      /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5692CD8: memset (string3.h:90)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5692CD8: GDALGeoPackageDataset::ReadTile(int, int,
>>      unsigned char*, bool*) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:641)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5692FA2: GDALGeoPackageDataset::ReadTile(int, int)
>>      (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:489)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5694B51: GDALGeoPackageRasterBand::IReadBlock(int,
>>      int, void*) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:733)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5553B15: GDALRasterBand::GetLockedBlockRef(int,
>>      int, int) (gdalrasterband.cpp:1142)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5572525: GDALRasterBand::IRasterIO(GDALRWFlag,
>>      int, int, int, int, void*, int, int, GDALDataType, long long, long
>>      long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (rasterio.cpp:307)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x557312A:
>>      GDALDataset::BlockBasedRasterIO(GDALRWFlag, int, int, int, int,
>>      void*, int, int, GDALDataType, int, int*, long long, long long, long
>>      long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (rasterio.cpp:2938)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x551B09C: GDALDataset::RasterIO(GDALRWFlag, int,
>>      int, int, int, void*, int, int, GDALDataType, int, int*, long long,
>>      long long, long long, GDALRasterIOExtraArg*) (gdaldataset.cpp:1991)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x551B11D: GDALDatasetRasterIO (gdaldataset.cpp:2034)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x56384C4: GDALWarpOperation::WarpRegion(int, int,
>>      int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, double, double)
>>      (gdalwarpoperation.cpp:1370)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x56387C6: GDALWarpOperation::ChunkAndWarpImage(int,
>>      int, int, int) (gdalwarpoperation.cpp:720)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x57A9F5A: GDALGeoPackageDataset::CreateCopy(char
>>      const*, GDALDataset*, int, char**, int (*)(double, char const*,
>>      void*), void*) (ogrgeopackagedatasource.cpp:3242)
>>      ==30978==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
>>      ==30978==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
>>      ==30978==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
>>      ==30978==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
>>      ==30978==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== HEAP SUMMARY:
>>      ==30978==     in use at exit: 138,658,730 bytes in 10,473 blocks
>>      ==30978==   total heap usage: 58,500 allocs, 48,027 frees,
>>      326,332,504 bytes allocated
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== 1,032 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
>>      4,171 of 4,283
>>      ==30978==    at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
>>      /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CEB222: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D200D7: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D29826: sqlite3_step (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D2A899: sqlite3_exec (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x57B297B: SQLCommand(sqlite3*, char const*)
>>      (ogrgeopackageutility.cpp:41)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x57A4D5C:
>>      GDALGeoPackageDataset::FinalizeRasterRegistration()
>>      (ogrgeopackagedatasource.cpp:1383)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x57A9CBA: GDALGeoPackageDataset::CreateCopy(char
>>      const*, GDALDataset*, int, char**, int (*)(double, char const*,
>>      void*), void*) (ogrgeopackagedatasource.cpp:3150)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5522F48: GDALDriver::CreateCopy(char const*,
>>      GDALDataset*, int, char**, int (*)(double, char const*, void*),
>>      void*) (gdaldriver.cpp:803)
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== 1,032 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
>>      4,172 of 4,283
>>      ==30978==    at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
>>      /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CEB222: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D200D7: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D29826: sqlite3_step (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D2A899: sqlite3_exec (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x57B297B: SQLCommand(sqlite3*, char const*)
>>      (ogrgeopackageutility.cpp:41)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5695415:
>>      GDALGeoPackageDataset::WriteShiftedTile(int, int, int, int, int,
>>      int, int) (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:1645)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x5695CAC:
>>      GDALGeoPackageRasterBand::IWriteBlock(int, int, void*)
>>      (gdalgeopackagerasterband.cpp:2121)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x555805F: GDALRasterBlock::Write()
>>      (gdalrasterblock.cpp:743)
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== 1,304 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
>>      4,186 of 4,283
>>      ==30978==    at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
>>      /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CCD0FF: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D003AE: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D007FA: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D012E8: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D0374F: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D06D63: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D09554: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D2346A: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== 3,912 bytes in 3 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
>>      4,228 of 4,283
>>      ==30978==    at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
>>      /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CCD0FF: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D003AE: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D007FA: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D012E8: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D0374F: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D06EB7: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D09554: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D2346A: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== 710,680 bytes in 545 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>>      record 4,275 of 4,283
>>      ==30978==    at 0x4C2BBCF: malloc (in
>>      /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CECC56: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CC92F5: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CCC5A6: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7CCD0FF: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D003AE: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D007FA: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D012E8: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D0374F: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D09228: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D2346A: ??? (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==    by 0x7D29826: sqlite3_step (in
>>      /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6)
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== LEAK SUMMARY:
>>      ==30978==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>>      ==30978==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>>      ==30978==      possibly lost: 717,960 bytes in 551 blocks
>>      ==30978==    still reachable: 137,940,770 bytes in 9,922 blocks
>>      ==30978==                       of which reachable via heuristic:
>>      ==30978==                         length64           : 483,616 bytes
>>      in 2,334 blocks
>>      ==30978==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>>      ==30978== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are
>>      not shown.
>>      ==30978== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full
>>      --show-leak-kinds=all
>>      ==30978==
>>      ==30978== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
>>      ==30978== ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from
>> 0) Segmentation fault (core dumped)



More information about the gdal-dev mailing list