[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 70: Guessing output format from output file name extension

Sean Gillies sean at mapbox.com
Mon Aug 21 13:30:15 PDT 2017


Hi Even,

This seems reasonable to me.

What will be done about the GeoJSON driver case, where we have one driver
covering both GeoJSON and EsriJSON (and other JSONs)? If a user specifies
foo.json which of the GeoJSON driver modes do they activate?


On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is a call for discussion on:
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc70_output_format_guess
>
>
>
> Summary:
>
> This proposal is to add syntaxic sugar to make GDAL and OGR command line
> utilities, so they take into account the extension of the output filename
> to guess which output driver to use, when it is not explicitly specified.
>
>
>
> Even
>
>
>
> --
>
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>
> http://www.spatialys.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>



-- 
Sean Gillies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20170821/376c9201/attachment.html>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list