[gdal-dev] C++11 timeline

[Andrew Bell]

There's a lot of code to work on.  Would it make sense just to make a C++11
branch and get to work, merging into master whenever it seems the right
time?

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 13 January 2017 at 02:57, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote:
> >
> > Kurt Schwehr <schwehr at gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > If no other packages start to depend on unreleased GDAL, and the first
> > GDAL release requiring C++11 is a ways off, and by then enough other
> > things require it that a system not having a C++11 compiler is totally
> > non-viable, then this shouldn't cause problems for pkgsrc.
> >
>
> FYI - the upcoming QGIS 3.0 release has a hard c++11 requirement. Not
> sure how much that affects things, but certainly projects which
> utilise GDAL are already switching to c++11.
>
> Nyall
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>



-- 
Andrew Bell
andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20170112/0ccbb0ba/attachment.html>