[gdal-dev] error reading AIG blocks
Even Rouault
even.rouault at spatialys.com
Fri May 12 09:34:06 PDT 2017
On jeudi 11 mai 2017 23:29:15 CEST Gregory, Matthew wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think this is a bug, but wanted to make sure I wasn't doing something
> stupid before I posted it as such.
>
> At r32878 (git 1eb605a), Even added new logic for dealing with raw 32-bit
> AIG blocks. I've got an AIG raster that has a few blocks where valid data
> is getting set to the min Int32 value (-2147483648) when doing a
> gdal_translate to GeoTiff.
>
> gdal_translate -of GTiff ai_bug ai_bug.tif
>
> Note the "old" way of getting these values was providing the correct values
> in this case:
>
> panData[i] = pabyCur[0] * 256 * 256 * 256
> + pabyCur[1] * 256 * 256
> + pabyCur[2] * 256
> + pabyCur[3] + nMin;
>
> Note that this is only affecting selected blocks within the raster. Other
> blocks seem to be just fine.
>
> Test raster posted here:
>
> ftp://ftp.fsl.orst.edu/pub/gregorym/gdal/ai_bug.7z (1MB)
>
> From my testing, <= 2.0 is OK, >= 2.1 is affected. Tested on Windows 10
> 64-bit.
Matt
Thanks for the report. I've fixed the issue per
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6886
AIG relies on rollover on addition of big negative values, which is undefined behaviour in C.
Interesting...
Can the test dataset be integrated in the GDAL test suite ? (probably in http://
download.osgeo.org/gdal/data/aig/ )
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20170512/78cea682/attachment.html>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list