[gdal-dev] RFC68: C++11 compilation mode - Call for vote on adoption

[Kurt Schwehr]

Joaquim,

Please give it another go at explaining what this use case is and the
issues with it.  I didn't follow your comments about the need for VS2013.
If users are on a legacy compiler (w.r.t. to C++11), can they not be served
by the 2.2 branch?  How does that use case fair with the impending GEOS
3.7.0 requiring a minimum of C++11?

Thanks,
-kurt

P.S. Doesn't really matter, but here is where I upped the version for VS on
Aug 14 after some discussion with Even:

https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc68_cplusplus11?action=diff&version=9&old_version=8


On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:

> On 6 September 2017 at 20:18, Joaquim Luis <jluis at ualg.pt> wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:34:06 +0100, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net>
> wrote:
> >> On 6 September 2017 at 19:14, Joaquim Luis <jluis at ualg.pt> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Wait, does this means that VS2013 will no longer be supported?
> >>
> >> With respect, Kurt has been asking for comments for very long time.
> >
> > Yes that's true, but always understood that VS2013 would be the minimum.
>
> Kurt posted [1] updated RFC 68 three weeks ago.
> It would be enough to have a glance to see VS2015.
>
> [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2017-August/046951.html
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
>



-- 
--
http://schwehr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20170906/22cfffdc/attachment.html>