[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 72: Run tests with pytest

[Kurt Schwehr]

I haven't had a chance to read the RFC yet, so I can't yet vote.  However,
a huge thank you to Craig and everyone else who put in effort to make this
happen!

On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 7:05 PM Craig de Stigter <
craig.destigter at koordinates.com> wrote:

> Jonathan
>
> > it's worth spending a little thought on coming up with a scheme for
> test-ids.
>
> I've been through the list of parametrized tests and tweaked the `ids`
> kwargs to make them a little more helpful at first glance:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/963/commits/8db599e7bc08b7dc73d81591898ed0f5f4243a58
>
> I didn't see any way to use `pytest_make_parametrize_id` really; IDs
> rightly vary enough between tests that I can't see that hook being very
> useful here.
>
> Cheers
> Craig de Stigter
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 09:59 jratike80 <
> jukka.rahkonen at maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote:
>
>> +0
>>
>> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>>
>>
>> Even Rouault-2 wrote
>> > PSC members,
>> >
>> > gentle reminder to cast your vote on this.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Even
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev



-- 
--
http://schwehr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20181209/fb776bdf/attachment.html>