[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 72: Run tests with pytest

[Kurt Schwehr]

To follow on to Howard's comment about testing in python...

I'm looking forward to the day that GDAL can drop all python 2.x support
and testing!

And anyone working on C++ testing is welcome to the code here.  I'll
happily donate it with a license change to GDAL (it's apache 2.0 right
now).  You are free refactor however.  Or just use any bits that you think
are helpful if going to a different testing library.  I can also donate
some of the 80+k files in my fuzzer corpus as test inputs that cover weird
corners of the code.

https://github.com/schwehr/gdal-autotest2/tree/master/cpp

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:39 AM Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:

> +1
>
> I watched the ticket traffic and shuddered :) Thank you. GDAL's testing
> probably predates five or six Python testing regimes/eras.  I also have
> the concern about GDAL's testing going through Python, but this RFC will
> make it much easier for people to contribute and improve the story.
>
>
> Congratulations on a huge lift!
>
>
> Howard
>
>
> On 12/9/18 9:48 PM, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> > I haven't had a chance to read the RFC yet, so I can't yet vote.
> However,
> > a huge thank you to Craig and everyone else who put in effort to make
> this
> > happen!
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 7:05 PM Craig de Stigter <
> > craig.destigter at koordinates.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >>> it's worth spending a little thought on coming up with a scheme for
> >> test-ids.
> >>
> >> I've been through the list of parametrized tests and tweaked the `ids`
> >> kwargs to make them a little more helpful at first glance:
> >>
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/963/commits/8db599e7bc08b7dc73d81591898ed0f5f4243a58
> >>
> >> I didn't see any way to use `pytest_make_parametrize_id` really; IDs
> >> rightly vary enough between tests that I can't see that hook being very
> >> useful here.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Craig de Stigter
> >>
> >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 09:59 jratike80 <
> >> jukka.rahkonen at maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +0
> >>>
> >>> -Jukka Rahkonen-
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Even Rouault-2 wrote
> >>>> PSC members,
> >>>>
> >>>> gentle reminder to cast your vote on this.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Even
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> gdal-dev mailing list
> >>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gdal-dev mailing list
> >> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gdal-dev mailing list
> > gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev



-- 
--
http://schwehr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20181210/aeee0ee3/attachment.html>