[gdal-dev] Help with idiomatic GDAL solution for raster algebra benchmark

[Mateusz Loskot]

On 19 June 2018 at 11:22, Alex HighViz <alexhighviz at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Regrettably I overstated the performance in my previous post, due to a bug that is now solved. With the solved bug, Pronto is about 50% slower than GDAL directly. I believe this is still good considering the benefits, but not as glamorous as I first thought. I have also applied it on a set of 100000 x 1000 rasters and the results are consistent.
>
> The related post has been updated (and I still consider it "promising"): https://github.com/ahhz/raster/blob/master/docs/_posts/2018-06-14-Preliminary-benchmark-results-are-promising.md

I might have missed that, but there seem to be no information about used
- compiler(s) and their versions
- compilation flags

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net