[gdal-dev] Help with idiomatic GDAL solution for raster algebra benchmark

[Alex HighViz]

On 19/06/2018 10:28, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 19 June 2018 at 11:22, Alex HighViz <alexhighviz at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Regrettably I overstated the performance in my previous post, due to a bug that is now solved. With the solved bug, Pronto is about 50% slower than GDAL directly. I believe this is still good considering the benefits, but not as glamorous as I first thought. I have also applied it on a set of 100000 x 1000 rasters and the results are consistent.
>>
>> The related post has been updated (and I still consider it "promising"): https://github.com/ahhz/raster/blob/master/docs/_posts/2018-06-14-Preliminary-benchmark-results-are-promising.md
> I might have missed that, but there seem to be no information about used
> - compiler(s) and their versions
> - compilation flags
>
> Best regards,

No you're right, that information is missing. I was using Visual Studio 15.2

/GS /GL /analyze- /W3 /Gy /Zc:wchar_t /Zi /Gm- /O2 /sdl 
/Fd"Release\vc141.pdb" /Zc:inline /fp:precise /D "_MBCS" 
/errorReport:prompt /WX- /Zc:forScope /Gd /Oy- /Oi /MD /std:c++latest 
/Fa"Release\" /EHsc /nologo /Fo"Release\" /Fp"Release\raster.pch" 
/diagnostics:classic