[gdal-dev] Alternative to GPKG format
koji higuchi
koji51guchi at gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 01:24:54 PDT 2018
Hi, following is the code I used:
Import os, osmium, fiona
fi = 'europe-latest.osm.pbf'
fo = 'europe-latest.dpkg'
drv = 'DPKG'
crs = {'no_defs': True, 'ellps': 'WGS84', 'datum': 'WGS84', 'proj':
'longlat'}
schema = {'geometry': 'LineString',
'properties': {'id': 'float', 'name' : 'str', 'kind' :
'str'}}
outfile = fiona.open(fo, 'w', driver=drv, crs=crs, schema=schema)
geomfab = osmium.geom.GeoJSONFactory()
class ShapeConverter(osmium.SimpleHandler):
def way(self, w):
if 'place' in w.tags:
rec = {'geometry' : eval(geomfab.create_linestring(w)),
'properties' : {'id' : float(w.id),
'name' : w.tags.get('name'),
'kind' : w.tags['place']}}
outfile.write(rec)
ShapeConverter().apply_file(fi, locations=True)
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 4:10 PM jratike80 <
jukka.rahkonen at maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote:
> koji higuchi wrote
> > Hi
> > I am extracting .osm.pbf file into .gpkg; but the writing rate is very
> > slow.
> > When I write into .shp, rate is faster but its limit is 4gb.
> > So, what other format is better for larger than 4gb requirement?
> > Thanks for your ideas.
> > Koji
>
> Hi,
>
> Show the exact command that you are using so we can see if it could be made
> faster. For example if you happen to use -skipfailures for handling the
> invalid geometries of the OSM data then you will make GDAL to do a new
> transaction for each row and that certainly is slow. But let's have a look
> at your command first.
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20181101/66e137e5/attachment.html>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list