[gdal-dev] GML xlink:href resolving: Any disadvantages to HUGE compared to NONE?
E.Nash at dvz-mv.de
Tue May 19 13:40:27 PDT 2020
Many thanks for the reply, Even. I'll just use HUGE then and ignore NONE.
Von: Even Rouault [mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2020 18:15
An: gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
Cc: Nash, Edward <E.Nash at dvz-mv.de>
Betreff: Re: [gdal-dev] GML xlink:href resolving: Any disadvantages to HUGE compared to NONE?
On mardi 19 mai 2020 09:49:58 CEST Nash, Edward wrote:
> I've just been reading the description of GML_SKIP_RESOLVE_ELEMS on
> https://gdal.org/drivers/vector/gml.html#gml-xlink-resolving and the
> advantages of using HUGE compared to NONE are clearly listed. My question
> is whether there are any serious disadvantages, such that it would not be a
> reasonable strategy to always use HUGE instead of NONE for resolving all
> xlink:hrefs? The use is in the context of a QGIS plugin, where temporary
> files are no problem and SQLite is going to be available.
GML_SKIP_RESOLVE_ELEMS=HUGE should be fine. It was added later than NONE
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gdal-dev