[gdal-dev] GML xlink:href resolving: Any disadvantages to HUGE compared to NONE?

[Nash, Edward]

Many thanks for the reply, Even. I'll just use HUGE then and ignore NONE.

Best regards,

Edward

Von: Even Rouault [mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2020 18:15
An: gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
Cc: Nash, Edward <E.Nash at dvz-mv.de>
Betreff: Re: [gdal-dev] GML xlink:href resolving: Any disadvantages to HUGE compared to NONE?


On mardi 19 mai 2020 09:49:58 CEST Nash, Edward wrote:

> Hi,

>

> I've just been reading the description of GML_SKIP_RESOLVE_ELEMS on

> https://gdal.org/drivers/vector/gml.html#gml-xlink-resolving and the

> advantages of using HUGE compared to NONE are clearly listed. My question

> is whether there are any serious disadvantages, such that it would not be a

> reasonable strategy to always use HUGE instead of NONE for resolving all

> xlink:hrefs? The use is in the context of a QGIS plugin, where temporary

> files are no problem and SQLite is going to be available.

>



GML_SKIP_RESOLVE_ELEMS=HUGE should be fine. It was added later than NONE



--

Spatialys - Geospatial professional services

http://www.spatialys.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20200519/8cf85710/attachment.html>