[gdal-dev] Adopting Contributor Covenant v2.0 as code of conduct

[Greg Troxel]

Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com> writes:

> Greg,
>
>> I am not following the logic here.  OSGeo has a code of conduct, and
>> requires that all projects use it.
>
> I was a bit confused because there are 2 pages:
> - https://www.osgeo.org/code_of_conduct/
> - https://www.osgeo.org/resources/osgeo-code-of-conduct/
>
> I actually started reading the former that would tend to point OSGeo projects 
> to use Contributor Covenant. Maybe one of those 2 pages is outdated.

I think what's going on is that the OSGeo Code of Conduct was adopted a
while ago and there is a new rule about using a different one.

> Honestly I don't really care about which CoC we select. We just need (a 
> somewhat reasonable) one, and above all, not create a new one.

Basically agreed.

>> For now, I'm opposed, and prefer to just add a line in README.md
>> 
>> See [the standard OSGeo Code of
>> Conduct](https://www.osgeo.org/resources/osgeo-code-of-conduct/).
>
> I had considered that too and would be fine with it.

Thanks - we'll see what others say.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20201125/381b9ea0/attachment.sig>