[gdal-dev] WFS Vector Layer Improvement

[Even Rouault]

(Adding back the list again, please "Answer all")

Le 29/08/2021 à 19:59, aharon david a écrit :
> Ok, you right. But what about to add it as an extention? Why to remove 
> it by force?
To avoid emitting confusing requests.
> As far as i can see in the code, other arbitary extenetions are 
> permitted, why not to permit also this one?
This would only make sense if there were popular servers to implement 
such an extension.
>
> בתאריך יום א׳, 29 באוג׳ 2021, 17:59, מאת Even Rouault 
> ‏<even.rouault at spatialys.com <mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com>>:
>
>     (Adding back the list)
>
>     you can see in the following URL that typename\typenames are exist
>     in the WFS2 schema examples:
>>     http://schemas.opengis.net/wfs/2.0/examples/KVP/kvp.txt
>>     <http://schemas.opengis.net/wfs/2.0/examples/KVP/kvp.txt>
>     In those examples, Typename is just for GetFeature and
>     DescribeFeatureType, not GetCapabilities
>>
>>     anyway, it is the standard of servers less than WFS 2.0 by sure.
>
>     Not in WFS 1.1 as far as I can see in
>     http://docs.opengeospatial.org/is/04-094r1/04-094r1.html#88
>     <http://docs.opengeospatial.org/is/04-094r1/04-094r1.html#88>
>
>     Even
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ‫בתאריך יום א׳, 29 באוג׳ 2021 ב-16:51 מאת ‪Even Rouault‬‏
>>     <‪even.rouault at spatialys.com <mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com>‬‏>:‬
>>
>>         David,
>>
>>         Per the standard (at least I checked in WFS 2.0),
>>         typename/typenames is not a standardized query parameter for
>>         GetCapabilities. Are you referring to some servers that would
>>         accept it as an extension ?
>>
>>         Even
>>
>>         Le 29/08/2021 à 08:06, aharon david a écrit :
>>>         Hi,
>>>
>>>         I want to suggest an  improvement in WFS Vector Layer.
>>>
>>>
>>>         my suggestion is just to remove the lines 839 and 840:
>>>          osURL = CPLURLAddKVP(osURL, "TYPENAME", nullptr);
>>>          osURL = CPLURLAddKVP(osURL, "TYPENAMES", nullptr);
>>>
>>>         in file: "gdal-3.3.1\ogr\ogrsf_frmts\wfs\ogrwfsdatasource.cpp".
>>>
>>>         The big advantage is that the GetCapabilitiy Response will
>>>         be minimal and contain info only
>>>         for the layers that are set in the tag - TYPENAME in case it
>>>         is placed in the pszBaseURL.
>>>
>>>         There is no disadvantage to this change.
>>>         There is no change in the function behavior.
>>>
>>>         THanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         gdal-dev mailing list
>>>         gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org  <mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>         https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev  <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev>
>>
>>         -- 
>>         http://www.spatialys.com  <http://www.spatialys.com>
>>         My software is free, but my time generally not.
>>
>     -- 
>     http://www.spatialys.com  <http://www.spatialys.com>
>     My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
-- 
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20210829/86866c0e/attachment-0001.html>