[gdal-dev] [OSGeo/gdal] Add GDT_Int8 support (RFC 87) (PR #6633)

[Sean Gillies]

Sorry, please disregard my previous email (from my phone at lunch). I had a
poor recollection of the GDALDataType enum.

Changing GDT_Byte to unsigned char is too big of a change, I guess? I can
work with that.

Is there any advantage to a GDT_UInt8 type that can't be changed by a
PIXELTYPE option?

On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 12:39 PM Even Rouault <notifications at github.com>
wrote:

> Ubyte (same as uint8) vs byte?
>
> what do you suggest exactly: keep GDT_Byte in the enumeration and add #define
> GDT_UByte GDT_Byte to create the alias ?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6633#issuecomment-1307736762>, or
> unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAIHIKG7X65SX4OULJMUFTWHKT5TANCNFSM6AAAAAAR2E6MJY>
> .
> You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> <OSGeo/gdal/pull/6633/c1307736762 at github.com>
>


-- 
Sean Gillies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20221108/2ecba5b9/attachment.htm>