[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 87: Signed int8 data type for raster

[Kurt Schwehr]

Yes please!  The friction from not having GDT_Int8 keeps coming up again
and again.  It is extra rough on beginners who hit this case.

But I would like to hear any voices for not doing this incase there is
something I haven't thought of.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 2:43 AM Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've posted in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6634 a new RFC to add
> a new GDT_Int8 data type, for signed 8-bit integer data, to the
> GDALDataType enumeration, which cleans up the current support we already
> have for that data type.
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20221108/9f0e7937/attachment.htm>