[gdal-dev] doc bugs about prereqs, surfaced by updating pkgsrc for 3.9

[Even Rouault]

> which is misplaced, because people are who merely intending to compile
> gdal but not contribute to it, still need to know.  I almost didn't even
> look at it before writing that it wasn't documented which C++ flavor is
> needed, because it was obviously not about what I needed to know.
Attempt to improve in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10151
>
> 2) NEWS for 3.9 does not mention that there is now a requirement for a C++17
> compiler.

==> 3rd bullet point of "In a nutshell"

* [RFC 
98](https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc98_build_requirements_gdal_3_9.html):
   Build requirements for GDAL 3.9

> 3) The person also marked gdal for c17

Can you be more explicit about you mean by "the person also marked gdal 
for c17" : where exactly?

-- 
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20240606/48f017d2/attachment.htm>