[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 105: Add and use safe path manipulation functions

[Javier Jimenez Shaw]

+1 Javier

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, 16:38 Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev, <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> +1 KurtS.
>
> Thank you!!
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:13 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The candidate implementation is now ready (I'm afraid nobody will find
>> the energy to review the ~ 4000 different edits throughout the code base...
>> ) and all CI targets are green. *All* use of the deprecated C versions has
>> been removed from our C++ code (besides the place where they are defined,
>> and autotest code), and the few uses of them in C code is OK. There's no
>> risk of re-introducing them since their definition is now hidden from GDAL
>> C++ code.
>>
>> So,
>>
>> Motion: RFC 105 text: Add and use safe path manipulation functions:
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11640
>>
>> Starting with my +1,
>>
>> Even
>>
>> -- http://www.spatialys.com
>> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>> Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this is just about bytes.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20250115/2e411bf1/attachment.htm>