[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 105: Add and use safe path manipulation functions

Daniel Baston dbaston at gmail.com
Wed Jan 15 08:07:23 PST 2025


+1 Dan

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:13 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The candidate implementation is now ready (I'm afraid nobody will find the
> energy to review the ~ 4000 different edits throughout the code base... )
> and all CI targets are green. *All* use of the deprecated C versions has
> been removed from our C++ code (besides the place where they are defined,
> and autotest code), and the few uses of them in C code is OK. There's no
> risk of re-introducing them since their definition is now hidden from GDAL
> C++ code.
>
> So,
>
> Motion: RFC 105 text: Add and use safe path manipulation functions:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11640
>
> Starting with my +1,
>
> Even
>
> -- http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
> Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this is just about bytes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20250115/d63465f5/attachment.htm>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list