[gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision

[Andrew Bell]

Would it be helpful to require an issue that describes the change to be
made and then some approval before permitting an PR to be opened? (I have
no idea if this is technically feasible.)

On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 12:29 PM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> based on the experience gained from the initial policy, I propose to
> significantly revise it to drastically limit their use. See
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/14500
>

-- 
Andrew Bell
andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20260513/fcd6e694/attachment.htm>