[gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision

[Even Rouault]

Andrew,

I doubt you can enforce that through github configuration, and even if 
we could, that seems to me like adding overhead to all the people acting 
reasonably (some "institutional" large projects may have that kind of 
policy, but none of the projects I regularly or occasionally contribute 
to require this). That said, opening an issue to discuss a problem and 
expose some ideas can certainly be done when needed (and going through a 
full RFC for substantial changes), but someone contributing a typo fix 
shouldn't have to open a ticket first.

Even

Le 13/05/2026 à 19:38, Andrew Bell a écrit :
> Would it be helpful to require an issue that describes the change to 
> be made and then some approval before permitting an PR to be opened? 
> (I have no idea if this is technically feasible.)
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 12:29 PM Even Rouault via gdal-dev 
> <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     based on the experience gained from the initial policy, I propose to
>     significantly revise it to drastically limit their use. See
>     https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/14500
>
>
> -- 
> Andrew Bell
> andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com

-- 
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20260514/b82cbf3c/attachment-0001.htm>