[gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision
Daniel Evans
daniel.fred.evans at gmail.com
Thu May 14 01:30:19 PDT 2026
I also strongly suspect that "require an issue to describe the issue" would
simply translate to "the LLM is asked to generate even more fluff than it
usually puts in the PR description".
Also, would it mean that one-line docs typo PRs need an approved issue? If
not, what would be the threshold for "this proposed change must be
approved" and who would decide it?
Cheers,
Daniel
On Wed, 13 May 2026 at 23:10, Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I doubt you can enforce that through github configuration, and even if we
> could, that seems to me like adding overhead to all the people acting
> reasonably (some "institutional" large projects may have that kind of
> policy, but none of the projects I regularly or occasionally contribute to
> require this). That said, opening an issue to discuss a problem and expose
> some ideas can certainly be done when needed (and going through a full RFC
> for substantial changes), but someone contributing a typo fix shouldn't
> have to open a ticket first.
>
> Even
> Le 13/05/2026 à 19:38, Andrew Bell a écrit :
>
> Would it be helpful to require an issue that describes the change to be
> made and then some approval before permitting an PR to be opened? (I have
> no idea if this is technically feasible.)
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 12:29 PM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> based on the experience gained from the initial policy, I propose to
>> significantly revise it to drastically limit their use. See
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/14500
>>
>
> --
> Andrew Bell
> andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com
>
> -- http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20260514/aead856d/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list