[OSGeodata] WFS-basic and geometadata exchange

Raj Singh raj at rajsingh.org
Tue Oct 24 07:36:44 EDT 2006


Yes, I've been getting a lot of feedback to that extent. I was trying  
to hold onto the WFS way of describing data schema as GML, but I  
think I need to abandon that WFS compatibility and go with something  
much simpler--probably still XML schema but I'm open to suggestions.
---
Raj


On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Pat Cappelaere wrote:

> However, I think that the DescribeFeatureType function and the  
> "pile" of
> XMLSchema description verbiage being returned now pushes it over  
> the top to
> WFS-Complex.





More information about the Geodata mailing list