[OSGeodata] WFS-basic and geometadata exchange
Raj Singh
raj at rajsingh.org
Tue Oct 24 07:36:44 EDT 2006
Yes, I've been getting a lot of feedback to that extent. I was trying
to hold onto the WFS way of describing data schema as GML, but I
think I need to abandon that WFS compatibility and go with something
much simpler--probably still XML schema but I'm open to suggestions.
---
Raj
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Pat Cappelaere wrote:
> However, I think that the DescribeFeatureType function and the
> "pile" of
> XMLSchema description verbiage being returned now pushes it over
> the top to
> WFS-Complex.
More information about the Geodata
mailing list