[geomoose-psc] Fwd: Motion: expand existing license to cover all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)

Dan Little danlittle at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 11 07:29:00 PDT 2012


Thought I was subscribed but looks like I created an account but never actually activated the account.  (I used the admin panel.)

I'm fine with +1'ing this.  The docs, IMO, are valuable to us and not others so I don't think a CC by SA or other such license will provide much benefit.  Also, if something in our docs are valuable to others than adding to the global mind-share in a free (as in speech) is more inline with my thinking anyway.



>________________________________
> From: Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
>To: Brent Fraser <bfraser at geoanalytic.com>; Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>; danlittle at yahoo.com 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:11 PM
>Subject: Fwd: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
> 
>If you guys have not already signed up for the psc email list, please do so.
>
>Thanks, Eli
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>Date: Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:25 AM
>Subject: RE: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover
>all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>To: "eadam at co.lincoln.or.us" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>,
>"geomoose-psc at osgeo.org" <geomoose-psc at osgeo.org>
>
>
>+1
>
>Bobb
>
>
>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-psc-
>>>  bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Eli Adam
>>>  Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:57 PM
>>>  To: geomoose-psc at osgeo.org
>>>  Subject: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover
>>>  all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>
>>>  On the to-do list for incubation is to directly state a
>>>  documentation license.  At the last PSC meeting, those present
>>>  were in favor of extending our existing license to all svn
>>>  contents (unless noted otherwise with their own included licenses
>>>  like included libraries).
>>>
>>>  This does not apply to included libraries and other files that
>>>  may already have a license header.
>>>  This does cover all the sphinx documentation.
>>>  The motion will be open for voting for two full business days.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Motion to extend our existing license,
>>>  http://www.geomoose.org/info/license.html, to cover all otherwise
>>>  unspecified contents of GeoMOOSE svn.
>>>
>>>  I'll start voting:
>>>  +1 Eli
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>  geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>  http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20121011/2fff1b23/attachment.html>


More information about the geomoose-psc mailing list