[geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)

[Eli Adam]

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just did a dry run of this to verify how it should work.  Eli, why don't you give it a try.

This looks great and straight forward.  I'll give this a try as soon
as I can get to the appropriate computer.

Thanks, Eli

>
> # Make a temporary work space
> mkdir temp-gm
> cd temp-gm
>
> # Checkout the branch
> svn co https://svn.osgeo.org/geomoose/geomoose2/branches/geomoose-2.6/sphinx-docs
> cd sphinx-docs
>
> # Merge in the changes from trunk
> svn merge https://svn.osgeo.org/geomoose/geomoose2/trunk/sphinx-docs
>
> # Look at merge conflicts and resolve them as needed.  (tc blindly accepts the trunk version)
> svn commit -m 'Merged in documentation changes from trunk'
>
>
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Eli Adam wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Should we add a "sphinx-docs/source/LICENSE.rst" page to clarify?
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>> Also as an FYI, only http://geomoose.org/trunk/ will show the r916
>> update at the bottom until our next release when it will also be
>> visible on http://geomoose.org
>>
>> Eli
>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
>>> To: "geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org" <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:33 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] Fwd: Motion: expand existing license to cover
>>> all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>
>>> With +1 from JimK, Bobb, Brent, Brian, Dan and me, the motion to
>>> extend our existing license to all otherwise unspecified contents of
>>> svn passes.  This includes the sphinx docs and excludes any external
>>> libraries.
>>>
>>> This is already largely implied with,
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/browser/geomoose2/trunk/LICENSE
>>>
>>> However, I've now updated the bottom line on our webpage, to directly
>>> state that, http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/changeset/916/
>>>
>>> Eli
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Thought I was subscribed but looks like I created an account but never
>>>> actually activated the account.  (I used the admin panel.)
>>>>
>>>> I'm fine with +1'ing this.  The docs, IMO, are valuable to us and not
>>>> others
>>>> so I don't think a CC by SA or other such license will provide much
>>>> benefit.
>>>> Also, if something in our docs are valuable to others than adding to the
>>>> global mind-share in a free (as in speech) is more inline with my thinking
>>>> anyway.
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
>>>> To: Brent Fraser <bfraser at geoanalytic.com>; Brian Fischer
>>>> <bfischer at houstoneng.com>; danlittle at yahoo.com
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:11 PM
>>>> Subject: Fwd: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover all
>>>> unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>>
>>>> If you guys have not already signed up for the psc email list, please do
>>>> so.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Eli
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>>>> Date: Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:25 AM
>>>> Subject: RE: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover
>>>> all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>> To: "eadam at co.lincoln.or.us" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>,
>>>> "geomoose-psc at osgeo.org" <geomoose-psc at osgeo.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Bobb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-psc-
>>>>>> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Eli Adam
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:57 PM
>>>>>> To: geomoose-psc at osgeo.org
>>>>>> Subject: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover
>>>>>> all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the to-do list for incubation is to directly state a
>>>>>> documentation license.  At the last PSC meeting, those present
>>>>>> were in favor of extending our existing license to all svn
>>>>>> contents (unless noted otherwise with their own included licenses
>>>>>> like included libraries).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This does not apply to included libraries and other files that
>>>>>> may already have a license header.
>>>>>> This does cover all the sphinx documentation.
>>>>>> The motion will be open for voting for two full business days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Motion to extend our existing license,
>>>>>> http://www.geomoose.org/info/license.html, to cover all otherwise
>>>>>> unspecified contents of GeoMOOSE svn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll start voting:
>>>>>> +1 Eli
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>