[geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)

[Eli Adam]

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just did a dry run of this to verify how it should work.  Eli, why don't you give it a try.

r923.  Does it all looks correct?

I then did r924 to change conf.py to release = '2.6.0' to keep it
separate from the backporting.  Does that matter?  Could I have done
it as one?

Eli

>
> This looks great and straight forward.  I'll give this a try as soon
> as I can get to the appropriate computer.
>
> Thanks, Eli
>
>>
>> # Make a temporary work space
>> mkdir temp-gm
>> cd temp-gm
>>
>> # Checkout the branch
>> svn co https://svn.osgeo.org/geomoose/geomoose2/branches/geomoose-2.6/sphinx-docs
>> cd sphinx-docs
>>
>> # Merge in the changes from trunk
>> svn merge https://svn.osgeo.org/geomoose/geomoose2/trunk/sphinx-docs
>>
>> # Look at merge conflicts and resolve them as needed.  (tc blindly accepts the trunk version)
>> svn commit -m 'Merged in documentation changes from trunk'
>>
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Eli Adam wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Should we add a "sphinx-docs/source/LICENSE.rst" page to clarify?
>>>
>>> Sure.
>>>
>>> Also as an FYI, only http://geomoose.org/trunk/ will show the r916
>>> update at the bottom until our next release when it will also be
>>> visible on http://geomoose.org
>>>
>>> Eli
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
>>>> To: "geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org" <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:33 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] Fwd: Motion: expand existing license to cover
>>>> all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>>
>>>> With +1 from JimK, Bobb, Brent, Brian, Dan and me, the motion to
>>>> extend our existing license to all otherwise unspecified contents of
>>>> svn passes.  This includes the sphinx docs and excludes any external
>>>> libraries.
>>>>
>>>> This is already largely implied with,
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/browser/geomoose2/trunk/LICENSE
>>>>
>>>> However, I've now updated the bottom line on our webpage, to directly
>>>> state that, http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/changeset/916/
>>>>
>>>> Eli
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> Thought I was subscribed but looks like I created an account but never
>>>>> actually activated the account.  (I used the admin panel.)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm fine with +1'ing this.  The docs, IMO, are valuable to us and not
>>>>> others
>>>>> so I don't think a CC by SA or other such license will provide much
>>>>> benefit.
>>>>> Also, if something in our docs are valuable to others than adding to the
>>>>> global mind-share in a free (as in speech) is more inline with my thinking
>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
>>>>> To: Brent Fraser <bfraser at geoanalytic.com>; Brian Fischer
>>>>> <bfischer at houstoneng.com>; danlittle at yahoo.com
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:11 PM
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover all
>>>>> unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>>>
>>>>> If you guys have not already signed up for the psc email list, please do
>>>>> so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Eli
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>>>>> Date: Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:25 AM
>>>>> Subject: RE: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover
>>>>> all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>>> To: "eadam at co.lincoln.or.us" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>,
>>>>> "geomoose-psc at osgeo.org" <geomoose-psc at osgeo.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Bobb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-psc-
>>>>>>> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Eli Adam
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:57 PM
>>>>>>> To: geomoose-psc at osgeo.org
>>>>>>> Subject: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover
>>>>>>> all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On the to-do list for incubation is to directly state a
>>>>>>> documentation license.  At the last PSC meeting, those present
>>>>>>> were in favor of extending our existing license to all svn
>>>>>>> contents (unless noted otherwise with their own included licenses
>>>>>>> like included libraries).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This does not apply to included libraries and other files that
>>>>>>> may already have a license header.
>>>>>>> This does cover all the sphinx documentation.
>>>>>>> The motion will be open for voting for two full business days.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Motion to extend our existing license,
>>>>>>> http://www.geomoose.org/info/license.html, to cover all otherwise
>>>>>>> unspecified contents of GeoMOOSE svn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll start voting:
>>>>>>> +1 Eli
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>>>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>