[geomoose-psc] Trac notifications?

Fri Apr 12 09:33:34 PDT 2013

Agree with Jim on that.  It’s tough enough just keeping the GeoMoose project moving forward with what is there now.

Brian Fischer, CFM
Principal | GIS Project Manager
Houston Engineering, Inc.
O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734

From: James Klassen [mailto:klassen.js at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:29 AM
To: Bob Basques
Cc: geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org; Brian Fischer
Subject: RE: [geomoose-psc] Trac notifications?

We want to keep the default/example services to one language.  We had multiple languages before and they all got out of sync with each other... It was just to much to maintain.

You cab write your own stuff in whatever language you want.  There are even some usable LISP web frameworks.  But I expect the project sticking with something that is currently more mainstream.
On Apr 12, 2013 11:19 AM, "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)" <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us<mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
And PERL!!

Bobb

From: Brian Fischer [mailto:bfischer at houstoneng.com<mailto:bfischer at houstoneng.com>]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:18 AM
To: James Klassen; Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
Cc: geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: RE: [geomoose-psc] Trac notifications?

Sounds like we need some funding to try to port the PHP services to Python ☺

Brian Fischer, CFM
Principal | GIS Project Manager
Houston Engineering, Inc.
O 763.493.4522<tel:763.493.4522> | D 763.493.6664<tel:763.493.6664> | M 763.229.2734<tel:763.229.2734>

From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of James Klassen
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:11 AM
To: Bob Basques
Cc: geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] Trac notifications?

The big problem with more than one GeoMoose version at a time is mod_php isn't very flexible.

GeoMoose JavaScript has no problem with multiple versions.

The problem is the PHP code is coupled to the JS version and is also coupled to the MapServer version.  We tend to target the latest MapServer available in MS4W to make life easy for our windows running users.

So we end up needing multiple MapServer versions to run multiple GeoMoose versions  (which is easy enough for Perl/python/ruby MapScript and also easy enough if we would decouple the (PHP) services from the JS code similar to how things originally worked at the city) but with PHP where everything essentially gets linked into Apache at runtime it makes life very difficult.
On Apr 12, 2013 11:01 AM, "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)" <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us<mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
All,

I have an interest in working on the "Demo" side of things, but I would prefer to work in a separate container of sorts, maybe more of a sandbox environment to be able to try different things, and to also possibly leave them in place between versions, at least for a couple of versions out.  I really like the sandbox approach used by OpenLayers for demos of particular capabilities.  Using this sort of model, it might be nice to see demos from more than one organization for different types of things over the long run.

The current demo looks to be tightly integrated with the GeoMoose website on the whole, and based on the distribution methods that are needed, this is probably a good thing.

So the question is, is there room for an extended set of demos, possibly housed somewhere besides the GeoMoose web site and tied in as a linked resource? This may be something that has some slight dependency on the future abstraction of some of the GeoMoose tools as well, at least in order for the idea to take off quicker.

bobb

>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:geomoose-psc-<mailto:geomoose-psc->
>>  bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:bounces at lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Eli Adam
>>  Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 10:48 AM
>>  To: James Klassen
>>  Cc: geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>  Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] Trac notifications?
>>
>>  Our docs partially suggest to confirm the bug on the list,
>>  http://geomoose.org/trunk/docs/faq.html?highlight=faq#how-should-
>>  i-report-a-bug
>>  and
>>  http://geomoose.org/trunk/howto/testing_reporting_ticketing.html#<http://geomoose.org/trunk/howto/testing_reporting_ticketing.html>
>>  testing-reporting-ticketing
>>
>>  I like the idea of confirming bugs in advance but think that in
>>  practice we will have to in some way deal with bugs that don't
>>  first go through the list.
>>
>>  I've taken default ownership of the 'Docs' and 'Website'
>>  components, is anyone interested in any of these components and
>>  following up on list or ticket?
>>      BuildTools
>>      Demo
>>      GeoMOOSE/JS
>>      GeoMOOSE/PHP
>>      Infrastructure
>>      UserExtensions
>>
>>  Eli
>>
>>
>>  On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:53 PM, James Klassen
>>  <klassen.js at gmail.com<mailto:klassen.js at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  > Generally, the owner of the ticket will get a notification.
>>  The
>>  > default owner is set at the component level.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Brian Fischer
>>  > <bfischer at houstoneng.com<mailto:bfischer at houstoneng.com>>
>>  > wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> I don't get any notification.
>>  >>
>>  >> I kind of like Jim's point that it would be nice to be
>>  discussed on
>>  >> the list first, but also see the point it would be nice to be
>>  >> notified if someone does enter a ticket so we can follow up
>>  >> immediately for clarification if the ticket is not clear and
>>  saves
>>  >> time later trying to sort that out.
>>  >>
>>  >> Brian Fischer, CFM
>>  >> Principal | GIS Project Manager
>>  >> Houston Engineering, Inc.
>>  >> O 763.493.4522<tel:763.493.4522> | D 763.493.6664<tel:763.493.6664> | M 763.229.2734<tel:763.229.2734>
>>  >>
>>  >> -----Original Message-----
>>  >> From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
>>  >> [mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Eli
>>  Adam
>>  >> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 5:29 PM
>>  >> To: geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>  >> Subject: [geomoose-psc] Trac notifications?
>>  >>
>>  >> Does anyone get Trac notifications when new tickets are
>>  opened?  The
>>  >> reason I ask is that if people enter tickets and don't get any
>>  >> response at all, it can be discouraging.
>>  >>
>>  >> I'm the default owner for Docs and website components so I get
>>  those
>>  >> notices.
>>  >>
>>  >> We could make this list the default owner, I also use
>>  >> http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/report/9 as a tab on my
>>  homepage to do
>>  >> it the manual way.  Other ideas?
>>  >>
>>  >> Eli
>>  >> _______________________________________________
>>  >> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>  >> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>  >> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>  >> _______________________________________________
>>  >> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>  >> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>  >> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>  >
>>  >
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  geomoose-psc mailing list
>>  geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>  http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20130412/29217ad7/attachment-0001.html>