[geomoose-psc] So, while looking at the MapServer Doc's . . .

[Eli Adam]

I'm fine with anything we do like this so long as someone takes active
ownership of it.  Ohloh for instance still lists the SourceForge source
location (in addition to the OSGeo one).  It might be easier to approach
this after we settle some of the other details that Jim mentioned, then
revisit this.

Eli


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:

> This might become moot once we switch to github.
>
> They have their own analytics.
>
> Also, we were thinking about using IO for the main project page (to
> provide separation between the project page and the software documentation
> which would stay in sphinx).
> On Jul 8, 2013 1:30 PM, "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)" <
> bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
>
>>  All,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I came across the OHLOH link in the left column of the MapServer home
>> page, was wondering if there was interest in adding the GeoMoose version to
>> the GeoMoose home page?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Here is the GeoMoose link version
>> http://www.ohloh.net/p/geomoose?ref=sample, I didn’t look to see what
>> they were using for the ohloh counter on the Mapserver page, but probably
>> portable . . .****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Bobb****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20130708/78468b20/attachment.html>