[geomoose-psc] GeoMoose 2.8
Brian Fischer
bfischer at houstoneng.com
Tue Jul 21 08:57:10 PDT 2015
Looks good. Great job guys!
Brian Fischer, CFM
GIS Project Manager / Vice President
Houston Engineering, Inc.
O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734
-----Original Message-----
From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klassen
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:38 AM
To: TC Haddad
Cc: Dan Little; GeoMOOSE PSC
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] GeoMoose 2.8
Ok. Changes tweaked and applied.
Any other last minute changes before we announce the release?
On 07/21/2015 01:19 AM, TC Haddad wrote:
> I think you can leave the recommended MS4W version as-is for now. I
> don't think the demo is using anything that breaks between Mapserver 6
> and 6.2, so you are covered there.
>
> The next significant release of MS4W will have Mapserver 7, which will
> trigger other updates to the Demo, e.g. deprecation of ANNOTATION
> layers (just tested and submitted that change...).
>
> Tanya
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you! Do you think we should we update our recommended MS4W
>> version (in VERSIONS.rst) to 3.1.0-beta1? Currently we say "3.0.6 or
>> higher".
>>
>> I have merged your pull request (and added show-legend=false to the
>> None layer too). That was a nice improvement. I didn't know we had
>> such an option.
>>
>> The 2.8.0 packages have been rebuilt.
>>
>> On 07/20/2015 11:41 PM, TC Haddad wrote:
>>> Well, I can confirm that the MS4W install works, and behaves like
>>> the
>> demo.
>>> Tested with the Mapserver 6.2.1 (MS4W 3.1.0-beta1) version of MS4W.
>>>
>>> Just submitted a suggested fix to tun off the 4 basemap legends
>>> where
>> they
>>> are broken / not expected to work. Not MS4W specific, just makes the
>>> demo look better IMHO.
>>>
>>> Other than that, looks good to me.
>>>
>>> T
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> I agree with Dan. While I have a lot of confidence on what is in
>>>> git right now, I'd still like a proof of working install via MS4W
>>>> (and to a lesser extent the tgz -- it is essentially the same as
>>>> what is running on demo.geomoose.org) before announcing.
>>>>
>>>> We (Dan and I at least) tend to focus on what is in git, and not
>>>> that the packaging actually worked.
>>>>
>>>> The 2.8.0 download is rebuilt with the MS4W version patch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07/20/2015 09:49 PM, Dan Little wrote:
>>>>> It would be nice to have a green light on the ms4w install first.
>>>>> I am going to write the release notes soon as well.
>>>>> On Jul 20, 2015 8:07 PM, "TC Haddad" <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll check the MS4W version tonight, and provide feedback asap.
>>>>>> How
>> long
>>>>>> do we have before you announce?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tanya
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Jim Klassen
>>>>>> <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> After all of the work over the past few months, we have closed
>>>>>>> or postponed all the 2.8 tickets and I have cut a 2.8 release.
>>>>>>> I'd appreciate it if you could check it for sanity before it is
>>>>>>> announced
>>>> to
>>>>>>> a wider audience.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As usual, it is available here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://demo.geomoose.org/2.8/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.geomoose.org/downloads/GeoMOOSE-2.8.0-MS4W.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.geomoose.org/downloads/geomoose-2.8.0.tar.gz
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>>>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
More information about the geomoose-psc
mailing list