[geomoose-psc] GeoMoose 2.8

[Jim Klassen]

Ok.  Changes tweaked and applied.

Any other last minute changes before we announce the release?

On 07/21/2015 01:19 AM, TC Haddad wrote:
> I think you can leave the recommended MS4W version as-is for now. I don't
> think the demo is using anything that breaks between Mapserver 6 and 6.2,
> so you are covered there.
>
> The next significant release of MS4W will have Mapserver 7, which will
> trigger other updates to the Demo, e.g. deprecation of ANNOTATION layers
> (just tested and submitted that change...).
>
> Tanya
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you!  Do you think we should we update our recommended MS4W
>> version (in VERSIONS.rst) to 3.1.0-beta1?  Currently we say "3.0.6 or
>> higher".
>>
>> I have merged your pull request (and added show-legend=false to the None
>> layer too).  That was a nice improvement.  I didn't know we had such an
>> option.
>>
>> The 2.8.0 packages have been rebuilt.
>>
>> On 07/20/2015 11:41 PM, TC Haddad wrote:
>>> Well, I can confirm that the MS4W install works, and behaves like the
>> demo.
>>> Tested with the Mapserver 6.2.1 (MS4W 3.1.0-beta1) version of MS4W.
>>>
>>> Just submitted a suggested fix to tun off the 4 basemap legends where
>> they
>>> are broken / not expected to work. Not MS4W specific, just makes the demo
>>> look better IMHO.
>>>
>>> Other than that, looks good to me.
>>>
>>> T
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> I agree with Dan.  While I have a lot of confidence on what is in git
>>>> right now, I'd still like a proof of working install via MS4W (and to a
>>>> lesser extent the tgz -- it is essentially the same as what is running
>>>> on demo.geomoose.org) before announcing.
>>>>
>>>> We (Dan and I at least) tend to focus on what is in git, and not that
>>>> the packaging actually worked.
>>>>
>>>> The 2.8.0 download is rebuilt with the MS4W version patch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07/20/2015 09:49 PM, Dan Little wrote:
>>>>> It would be nice to have a green light on the ms4w install first. I am
>>>>> going to write the release notes soon as well.
>>>>> On Jul 20, 2015 8:07 PM, "TC Haddad" <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll check the MS4W version tonight, and provide feedback asap. How
>> long
>>>>>> do we have before you announce?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tanya
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> After all of the work over the past few months, we have closed or
>>>>>>> postponed all the 2.8 tickets and I have cut a 2.8 release.  I'd
>>>>>>> appreciate it if you could check it for sanity before it is announced
>>>> to
>>>>>>> a wider audience.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As usual, it is available here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://demo.geomoose.org/2.8/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.geomoose.org/downloads/GeoMOOSE-2.8.0-MS4W.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.geomoose.org/downloads/geomoose-2.8.0.tar.gz
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>>>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>>>>>
>>