[geomoose-psc] RFCs 6 + 7

[Dan Little]

Updated RFC-7.   If y'all need/want more lemme know!

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 07:15 PM, Eli Adam wrote:
>
>> RFC-6 looks good.  Have we checked with any fiscal agents to see if
>> they can implement it?  Sounds good to me but I'm not too
>> knowledgeable about current financial practices.
> I don't see anything in it that I imagine would be objectionable to a
> fiscal agent.
>
> Maybe this should be clarified, but my understanding is the git stuff is
> internal to the PSC and it is the job of the PSC chair to keep it up to
> date with spending authorized by PSC vote and reports of contributions
> or expenditures from the fiscal agent.
>
>>
>> RFC-7 is fairly light on detail but captures some of the main points.
>> I'm not sure that we'll have more detail until we're further down the
>> road so little detail may be fine.  We may want to address GeoMOOSE
>> 2.#, like it will go into maintenance and minor releases only with
>> little focus and effort.
> There is also the reality that tasks 1 and 2 are done so we might as
> well record what was chosen.
>
> I would also suggest adding tasks:
> 4. Document, Document, Document!
> 5. Test, Test, Test!
>>
>>
>>> 3. Vote.  Please using something like "+1 BOTH", "+1 RFC-6", "+1
>>> RFC-7" and not simply "+1" to ensure clarity.
>> Let's vote as a separate stage after some discussion.
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>>> Thanks folks!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc