[geomoose-psc] RFCs 6 + 7

[Jim Klassen]

On 04/11/2017 07:15 PM, Eli Adam wrote:

> RFC-6 looks good.  Have we checked with any fiscal agents to see if
> they can implement it?  Sounds good to me but I'm not too
> knowledgeable about current financial practices.
I don't see anything in it that I imagine would be objectionable to a
fiscal agent.

Maybe this should be clarified, but my understanding is the git stuff is
internal to the PSC and it is the job of the PSC chair to keep it up to
date with spending authorized by PSC vote and reports of contributions
or expenditures from the fiscal agent.

>
> RFC-7 is fairly light on detail but captures some of the main points.
> I'm not sure that we'll have more detail until we're further down the
> road so little detail may be fine.  We may want to address GeoMOOSE
> 2.#, like it will go into maintenance and minor releases only with
> little focus and effort.
There is also the reality that tasks 1 and 2 are done so we might as
well record what was chosen.

I would also suggest adding tasks:
4. Document, Document, Document!
5. Test, Test, Test!
>
>
>> 3. Vote.  Please using something like "+1 BOTH", "+1 RFC-6", "+1
>> RFC-7" and not simply "+1" to ensure clarity.
> Let's vote as a separate stage after some discussion.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
>> Thanks folks!
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc