[geomoose-psc] Publishing the Ledger
Jim Klassen
klassen.js at gmail.com
Sat Dec 9 10:36:12 PST 2017
Ok. CSV or maybe even just markdown. Whatever keeps it simple.
On 12/08/2017 01:47 PM, Dan Little wrote:
> CSV is fine with me as well. That does allow for easy diffing and use
> of spreadsheet programs as desired. I will probably also include a
> "check balance" Python script for doing some basic reporting. There
> are CLI and text based ledger programs. I really don't want to go
> deep into a format debate or over-do the accounting for what really is
> a simple money-in-money-out + voting record.
>
> In terms of backup and redundancy, I will have the repo cloned
> locally, which gets backed up regularly, and those who have interest
> will also be able to do pulls. The bank account should also have some
> information and I'll put Nancy and Steve's contact information in the
> repository so that if something unfortunate were to happen, someone
> will be able to pick up the torch and continue on.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us
> <mailto:eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>> wrote:
>
> Thanks for starting this Dan. Github doesn't seem quite right (unless
> open source projects also got one private repo for security, finances,
> and other non-public issues)
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:25 AM, James Klassen
> <klassen.js at gmail.com <mailto:klassen.js at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Thoughts:
> >
> > A plain text format might be better suited with git. Org would
> be ideal (it
>
> I was also thinking of some form of text format.
>
> > can save formulas and recalculate like spreadsheets) except for
> most of the
> > magic only works in emacs, and despite emacs clearly being the
> one true
> > editor, I realize not everyone is ready to accept that yet.
> But, some other
> > format like CSV or markdown table could work too. Mostly, I'd
> like to be
>
> CSV is simple text and can still be used by spreadsheet programs.
>
> > able to use diff/blame to make it easy to audit who changed what
> when.
>
> Yes, changesets was the point. I suppose that there is not going to
> be a lot of churn on this file so I could download 10 copies of binary
> files and open and look at them. But that is using me (a human) to do
> diffs.
>
> >
> > The geomoose.org <http://geomoose.org> server is only
> sporatically backed up right now (mostly
> > before and after larger system config changes and GeoMoose
> releases). I
> > have been assuming the day to day changes are covered by what is
> on github
> > and people's local clones. Thus is this isn't living on github,
> we should
> > be extra sure we are maintaining a separate copies (that are
> kept up to
> > date) off server.
> >
> > I have no problem with git over ssh (or git over email). That
> is how it was
> > designed to work in the first place. We could go as simple as
> using the
> > geomoose account or even easily setup gitolite.
>
>
> Every PSC meeting that has a report about finances could be a prompt
> for PSC members to copy the repo somewhere.
>
> >
> > We should maybe look at using GPG signed commits (git commit -S)
> for this
> > repo.
>
> Maybe. I don't expect that we'll have confusion over who is making
> the commits.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
> >
> > On Dec 8, 2017 8:44 AM, "Dan Little" <theduckylittle at gmail.com
> <mailto:theduckylittle at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Folks,
> >>
> >> I have put together the start of a 'ledger'. Right now it's a
> spreadsheet
> >> in .ODS format. Barring objections, I'd like to create a
> repository on the
> >> web-server which can be accessed over SSH to store the ledger.
> This can
> >> give folks who are interested access without putting
> _everything_ up on
> >> GitHub.
> >>
> >> For those interested, we have $1,126 available at present.
> >>
> >> Thanks again!
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geomoose-psc mailing list
> >> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geomoose-psc mailing list
> > geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20171209/252edc7e/attachment.html>
More information about the geomoose-psc
mailing list