[geomoose-psc] https for geomoose.org
James Klassen
klassen.js at gmail.com
Sat May 27 08:40:24 PDT 2017
I don't see how it matters. It all lives in geomoose-website.git so either
way it will grow the repo (by 9kB per year).
On May 27, 2017 9:49 AM, "Dan Little" <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:
> Should we just make a stable "foss4g-next.png" on geomoose.org?
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:39 PM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yep.
>>
>> On May 26, 2017 18:29, "Eli Adam" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Looks like the "OpenStreetMap - Black and White" layer is the only one
>>> > that isn't available over https. I have updated the rest of the
>>> > externally referenced layers in master as well as the google maps API
>>> > and copied the foss4g2017 logo internally.
>>>
>>> Looks like this was for 2.# demo, not 3.0.
>>>
>>> Eli
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 05/25/2017 06:51 PM, Eli Adam wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> Sorry this is only a partial answer...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We can move almost all of that stuff to schemaless urls. Simply
>>> remove
>>> >>> "http:" from the URL and they'll automatically switch between http
>>> and
>>> >>> https.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> I have enabled https on the *.geomoose.org sites. Besides
>>> generally
>>> >>>> being considered a good idea lately, and Let's Encrypt making it
>>> trivial
>>> >> Yes, good to use https, also if we use https, that is useful testing
>>> >> for people who want to run with https.
>>> >>
>>> >> Let's Encrypt is good but we need to have our automated renewal
>>> >> working well. Some sites seem to never figure that out and are always
>>> >> down because of it.
>>> >>
>>> >>>> and free to do so, the motivation is that some features in GeoMoose
>>> 3.0,
>>> >>>> most notably the "Find Me", are blocked by Chrome if they don't
>>> >>>> originate from an a site served by https.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> This does cause some warnings and blocking now from pulling things
>>> in
>>> >>>> from non-https external sites.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The FOSS4G image hosted at mapserver.org has no https equivalent
>>> that I
>>> >>>> have found. We could self host as an easy work around.
>>> >> Seems that this should be hosted on http://2017.foss4g.org/ but that
>>> >> isn't https either.
>>> >>
>>> >>>> The Google maps API in 2.x is pulled in using
>>> >>>> http://maps.googleapis.com and not https://maps.googleapis.com (or
>>> >>>> //maps.googleapis.com).
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> OpenStreetMap is pulled in from XYZ using http (defined in the
>>> mapbook)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> ArcGIS 9.3 Rest Example is pulled in using http.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Weather Radar is pulled in using http.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> These will require a patches to all the active 2.x series branches
>>> so
>>> >>>> they are picked up in the demo.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> There is probably more, but this is what I found in a quick test. I
>>> >>>> haven't checked if the remote sites are available over https or
>>> not. If
>>> >>>> they are not, are the mixed-content warnings acceptable?
>>> >> If we are demonstrating an https instance, that doesn't really do it.
>>> >>
>>> >>>> Other thoughts?
>>> >> https is sometimes slower which could make the demo look slow but it
>>> >> still seems plenty fast to me testing (although with many images http
>>> >> that isn't really testing anything).
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for doing this Jim.
>>> >>
>>> >> Eli
>>> >>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>> >>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>> >>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20170527/8b780d0a/attachment.html>
More information about the geomoose-psc
mailing list