[Geomoose-users] [Geomoose-developers] Moose Test Demo

Fischer, Brian bfischer at houstonengineeringinc.com
Thu May 22 18:43:09 EDT 2008


Adam,

 

I am definitely seeing faster redraw speeds than that.  Are you
comparing apples to apples on the hardware and bandwidth speed for the
two applications?  If not that can have a lot to do with it.

 

Also are you following the best practices for optimizing mapfiles?  Are
you reprojecting any data on the fly?  Do you  have .qix files (spatial
indexes) built for your shapefiles?

 

All of these things will help out.

 

-Brian

 

From: geomoose-developers-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:geomoose-developers-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of
Adam Feidt
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:04 PM
To: geomoose-developers at lists.sourceforge.net;
geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Geomoose-developers] Moose Test Demo

 

Hello all,

     I sent out a sample demo to some of our web app. users this
morning.  I'm starting to get some feedback from our users as they test
it out.  If you're interested I will keep you updated on additional
feedback from our sample group.  Initially the main concern so far has
been speed.  It appears most of our users are seeing about a 5-10 second
redraw speed depending on which and how many layers they have loaded.
This will probably be deemed unacceptable to most of our users seeing
our current application redraws in less than 2 seconds with most layers.
I know we have discussed tiling layers, which I'm not currently doing,
but how much faster will my application run if I tile our larger files
like the aerial, parcels, and utility files?  Is it worth exploring
tiling all these layers?  Are most Moose users seeing faster redraw
speeds?

 

Adam M. Feidt

GIS Coordinator

City of Eden Prairie

8080 Mitchell Rd

Eden Prairie, MN 55344

phone# 952-949-8443

fax# 952-949-8334

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20080522/895d3ac0/attachment.html


More information about the Geomoose-users mailing list