[Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the Live DVD, which is more stable?

[Dan Little]

Ugh... Yeah, GM2.4 has a ton of fixes that are reasonably important.  Especially when you take it away from the demo configuration.



>________________________________
>From: Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>To: geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:24 AM
>Subject: [Geomoose-users] POLL:  Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the Live DVD, which is more stable?
>
>
>All, 
>
>in your estimation (of those that have used GM2.4, would you think that 2.4 is more or as stable as GM2.2? 
>
>It has been suggested that using GM2.2 for the LiveDVD may be better than going with a newer version. 
>
>Any thoughts? 
>
>bobb 
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
>authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
>Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>_______________________________________________
>Geomoose-users mailing list
>Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20110615/f073647c/attachment.html