[Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the Live DVD, which is more stable?

[Bob Basques]

Dan, 

That's the problem.  I had to build a case to include some local demos in the LIVE DVD installer ,but not everything seems to work in the 2.2 stuff, so to fix, it seems better to address the same capabilities in the 2.4 version instead of repairing the 2.2 demos. 

bobb 



>>> Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:


Ugh... Yeah, GM2.4 has a ton of fixes that are reasonably important.  Especially when you take it away from the demo configuration. 





From: Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
To: geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:24 AM
Subject: [Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the Live DVD, which is more stable?


All, 



in your estimation (of those that have used GM2.4, would you think that 2.4 is more or as stable as GM2.2? 



It has been suggested that using GM2.2 for the LiveDVD may be better than going with a newer version. 



Any thoughts? 



bobb 






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geomoose-users mailing list
Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20110615/eb3a1e88/attachment.html