[Geomoose-users] Recommended MS4W/GeoMoose version?
Jim Klassen
klassen.js at gmail.com
Tue Nov 22 20:29:39 EST 2011
I think a 2.4.1 with the main.js:501 comma fix and the MS 6 fixes would be a good plan. Even after 2.6 some people may want to continue to run a 2.4 series.
On Nov 22, 2011, at 15:15, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
> Until we get the next release (2.6) out, do we have a recommended MS4W
> and GeoMoose version combination?
>
> Although I've only done limited testing, it seems that the most recent
> MS4W (3.0.3) with GeoMoose 2.4 with a few changes is the best bet.
>
> The changes needed to GeoMoose 2.4 that I have noted so far are:
>
> -PHP: layerObj->getFeature() is gone, use layerObj->getShape() instead.
> -geomoose_globals.map: GD/JPEG driver is gone, use AGG/JPEG.
> Default to PNG not GIF.
> -symbol.sym: Comment out GAP and STYLE as they have moved into the STYLE
> stanza in the mapfile from the SYMBOL definition.
> (All done in trunk with revision 468)
> -And the trailing commas in main.js (501) and compiled.js (2216)
>
> Other changes?
>
> Should we consider a 2.4.1 release with these changes or just focus on 2.6?
>
> Bests, Eli
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
More information about the Geomoose-users
mailing list