[Geomoose-users] Welcome to OSGeo incubation

[Jody Garnett]

Catching up, comments inline ...

I continued from Bob's template and filled in a rough draft,
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoMoose_Incubation_Status.  For the rest of
> the PSC, please review and improve.
>

And ask questions so I feel useful :-)

The next big tasks to work on are the code provenance review and perhaps
> more formal code contributor guidelines.
> Here are some other code reviews to look at:
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Incubation_Committee#Graduated


The deegree project in that list was an especially organised example; you
can record the review wherever you like. For GeoTools we did it in little
text files right in our code base (and ask that new modules fill in a text
file when we accept them into the codebase).

>
> I can't find it now, but I thought that I saw something in the Rasdaman
> project (trac, wiki or something else) that required you to check a box to
> submit something.  The checkbox said something like: "I am contributing
> this under the Rasdaman code contribution guidelines (link to details...)"
> I can't find it and I'm not certain which project it was but we could
> consider something like that.  If anyone can dig something like that up it
> might be an example worth reviewing.
>

What do you guys have for code contributions currently? We don't really
need to mess with anything the project is doing during incubation (this is
more a checklist and is not intended to disrupt the way you do things).

That said incubation is often an amusing time to talk through such things;
but save changing to procedures until after if possible.

>
> Jody, I left a question in the wiki for you pertaining to Board approval.
>

Good question about board approval; for me the incubation chair has always
handled it. I will have to pester them.

Jody
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20111129/6b493905/attachment.html