[Geomoose-users] PSC Update: Progress on Versioned Docs

[Brent Fraser]

Jim,

   I'm sure I don't understand all the ramifications of what you've 
written, but one thing I'd insist on is the tag rule: if we release it, 
it gets tagged.  Otherwise support gets too hard....

Best Regards,
Brent Fraser


On 11/28/2011 9:07 AM, James Klassen wrote:
> Personally, I would like to see SVN reorganized to follow the general 
> standard form for /trunk /branches and /tags.  Besides being less 
> confusing for developers from other projects, this will make use of 
> hg/git/bzr as clients to the svn repository much easier for those who 
> like to develop offline or maintain site-specific local branches.  I'm 
> thinking the best time to do this is when the repository is moved over 
> to OSGEO hosting from SF.net, since everyone will need to switch or 
> re-checkout anyway.
>
> I'm thinking something along the lines of
> /moose
>  /trunk
>  /branches
>  /tags
>   /1.0
>   /1.1
>   /1.4
>   /1.6 (this currently doesn't exist in SVN, but IIRC we released it)
> /moose2
>  /trunk
>  /branches (used to add changes to older version of the code like the 
> 2.4.1 fixes we've been discussing)
>   /2.0
>   /2.2 (also not currently in SVN)
>   /2.4
>  /tags (the rule is if it gets released, it gets tagged)
>   /2.0
>   /2.2 (also not currently in SVN)
>   /2.4
>   /2.4.1
>   /current
>
> As far as I know, my /moose2-branches/url_mapbook-jk is way out of 
> date and doesn't have value anymore and can be deleted.  I'm not sure 
> what /sandbox-len is?
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com 
> <mailto:danlittle at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>     You can see the differences here:
>     - http://www.geomoose.org/2.4/
>
>     - http://www.geomoose.org/2.4/api/
>     - http://www.geomoose.org/trunk/
>
>     - http://www.geomoose.org/trunk/api/
>
>
>     Right now "/" points to a different directory altogether called
>     "snapshot_20111128", until this morning "/" pointed the docs built
>     from trunk.  Back in Denver we discussed that this is sub-optimal
>     since very few users actually work straight out of trunk.   Sorry
>     JimK, you will ned to use "/trunk" to find it into the future.
>      When we finalize the 2.6 docs, we will mark that as the "current"
>     branch in the doc build scripts and point "/" to that.
>
>     This change has not effected the organization in SVN so Eli,
>     myself, and others should be able to continue as normal.
>
>     There are also two super-nerd changes we should consider:
>     1) Support IPv6.  This is a tenant of JimK's religion.  While I'm
>     not observant of his church, I think it certainly would like to
>     see us execute on this particular project.
>     2) SSL?  A freebie signed certificate is available but I'm really
>     not sure it's necessary as we do not collect, require,
>     nor disseminate PII.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Geomoose-users mailing list
>     Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20111128/63f460ab/attachment.html