[Geomoose-users] Welcome to OSGeo incubation

[Dan Little]

IMO, we do need some improvement in code-accountability.  We setup trac to open up to the world, then locked it down when we discovered the world was mostly spam.

In our last PSC meeting we decided to create a working list for 2.6 in Trac.  While it doesn't have real accountability or systematic feedback, it at least makes a list, is this a reasonably satisfactory start?  I would intend to include the "*" stating we are going to implement Trac once some of the coding issues clear.



>________________________________
> From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>To: Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> 
>Cc: geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org; Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> 
>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:21 AM
>Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] Welcome to OSGeo incubation
> 
>
>Previously done, although in an admittedly much inferior wording,
>>http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoMoose_Incubation_Status#Infrastructure_Transition
>>
>>
>>Open for all to edit...
>Looks pretty good; it tells me where the code is - wish I could click through to the issue tracker link.
>
>
>As an aside when you do your providence (i.e. code review) - you don't have to actually fix things - only list them in your issue tracker.
>
>
>It is important for prospective contributors to know what the issues are; they can always pay you to fix them if they care. The real danger is the unknown issues; which is what the providence review is designed to get a handle on.
>
>
>Cheers,
>Jody
>
>
> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geomoose-users mailing list
>Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20111130/fd284ee2/attachment.html