[Geomoose-users] Poor quality WMS display in IE
Brent Fraser
bfraser at geoanalytic.com
Thu Oct 20 10:41:56 EDT 2011
Bob,
Genius no, but I can be persistent. This is really just a
work-around. If your users expand the layer name in the Catalog by
clicking on it and use Fade/Unfade controls, the problem will appear
again (unless you disable the Fade controls).
Best Regards,
Brent Fraser
On 10/20/2011 8:34 AM, Bistrais, Bob wrote:
>
> Brent- you are a genius!! I removed the opacity setting for the WMS
> in mapook.xml, and now it's looking correct in IE8.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bob
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*Brent Fraser [mailto:bfraser at geoanalytic.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 20, 2011 10:19 AM
> *To:* Bistrais, Bob
> *Cc:* geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Geomoose-users] Poor quality WMS display in IE
>
> Bob,
>
> Check your "opacity" setting for the WMS <map-source> in your map
> book and set it to 100 (or remove it). As Michael points out, IE has
> problems using both Alpha (a band in the image) and transparency (a
> setting in the browser) for a PNG image.
>
> Best Regards,
> Brent Fraser
>
>
> On 10/19/2011 3:01 PM, Bistrais, Bob wrote:
>
> I'm using a WMS service of our base data in a GeoMoose application.
> The WMS is at MapServer 6.0.1 with a PNG output type. My GeoMoose
> installation is the Oregon variant 2.2 (MapServer 5.6?).
>
> This service looks poor in the application when in Internet Explorer
> (version 8), but looks great in Firefox, Chrome, and Safari. The WMS
> also looks fine in ArcGIS, and also in IE with a simple WMS GetMap
> request.
>
> Right now, the WMS service and my app are on our test server, which
> you should be able to look at. I will give you the caveat that the
> application is still being built and many controls are not yet
> working, but if anyone wants to take a look, here are the URLs:
>
> WMS Service:
>
> http://mapservertest.maine.gov/wms/mapserv.exe?map=c:/wms/basemapNew.map&SERVICE=WMS&
> <http://mapservertest.maine.gov/wms/mapserv.exe?map=c:/wms/basemapNew.map&SERVICE=WMS&>
> -WMS version 1.1.1
>
> Here is the URL for the simple WMS request I tried, and looks OK in IE:
>
> http://mapservertest.maine.gov/wms/mapserv.exe?map=c:/wms/basemapNew.map&SERVICE=wms&version=1.1.1&request=GetMap&layers=towns24_poly,Roads,Hydrography&BBOX=437700,4907800,439030,4909100&SRS=EPSG:26919&FORMAT=image/png&width=800&height=600
> <http://mapservertest.maine.gov/wms/mapserv.exe?map=c:/wms/basemapNew.map&SERVICE=wms&version=1.1.1&request=GetMap&layers=towns24_poly,Roads,Hydrography&BBOX=437700,4907800,439030,4909100&SRS=EPSG:26919&FORMAT=image/png&width=800&height=600>
>
> GeoMoose Application:
>
> http://mapservergeotest.maine.gov/broadband/index.html#
> <http://mapservergeotest.maine.gov/broadband/index.html> -Zoom in on
> a town and you will see poor graphic quality in IE, but looks good in
> other browsers.
>
> But what could be causing the poor display only with IE? Could it be
> OpenLayers causing the problem? Other ideas? Has anyone else had
> this experience? Is there some setting on IE that I need to adjust?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20111020/f696afe1/attachment.html
More information about the Geomoose-users
mailing list